Samsung Galaxy S4 Deals. Price Comparison: AT&T $168 Amazon, Verizon $179.99 Target

samsung_galaxy_s4Looking to get your hands on the hottest smartphone on the market?  We have aggregated all the top vendors for the Samsung Galaxy S4.  See table below for the latest price.

We found five carriers that offer service on for the Galaxy S4.  Although, there are rumors of other carriers offering the service, we could not find the device offered directly on their websites.

If you choose not to upgrade directly from the carriers, you might be able to score a better deal from third party vendors.

  • For AT&T service, you should check out Amazon for $ 168.
  • Verizon Wireless customers can upgrade for $ 20 less than its flagship store for $ 179 at Target Mobile.  Verizon is currently taking preorders on the phone, it has not yet officially released the phone.  The shipping date is May 30th.
  • Sprint is going all out, offering service at just about any big name stores, ranging from $ 149.99 to $ 249.99.  Keep in mind, the $ 149.99 price includes the $ 100 discount applied to customers switching service from another carrier.  Consider it a customer acquisition cost to Sprint.  For current customers, the best deal for Sprint can be found at Target.
  • T-Mobile is offering the Galaxy S4 for $ 149.99, but the price is essentially a down payment, user is expected to fork over additional $ 20 a month for 24 months.  The pricing is not the traditional plans you have seen.  If you want to find out more about T-Mobile’s new phone plan, Maggie from CNET can explain for you here.
  • We have not seen U.S. Cellular offering the phone at third party stores, but they do offer on their site for the standard $ 199.99 price.

Samsung Galaxy S4 Deals.  Price Comparison:

Note: if you find other stores or carriers offering this phone, please let us know by commenting below or use the contact us form found at the top.

Click on the carrier names at the top row of this chart to sort by price.

*Prices as of May 6th

 
AT&T
Verizon
Sprint
T-Mobile
US Cellular
Carrier$ 199.99$ 199.99$ 149.99$ 149.99$ 199.99
Amazon$ 168$ 149.99
Walmart$ 168$ 199.99$ 224
Radio Shack$ 249.99$ 249.99
Wirefly$ 179.99$ 199.99
Best Buy$ 199.99$ 249.99$ 299.99
Target$ 179.99$ 199.99

 

The Droid Guy

StumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookRedditLinkedInEmail

Video Review: Ubuntu 12.10 VS Windows 8

CORRECTION // *Ubuntu CAN ‘Read/Write’ NTFS* In this video I do an in-depth comparison of Windows 8 and Ubuntu 12.10. Installation, Interface, Optimisation, …

Ubuntu 12.10 (2012) is a very well known and popular linux distro that uses the unity desktop environment. It is completely free with a lot of free open sour…
Video Rating: 4 / 5

StumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookRedditLinkedInEmail

Samsung Galaxy S4 vs HTC One – Specs Comparison

With HTC’s One out and about for a few days now in America and Samsung’s Galaxy S4 ready to make its debut in less than a week, it’s time to crunch the numbers and make your final decision.

Is any one of these two giants the right phone for you? Is the Galaxy S4 worth upgrading if you purchased an S3 just a year ago? Is the One the answer to HTC’s prayers and the device to put the company again on the map? And ultimately, which of the two is better?

Samsung Galaxy S4 vs HTC One

After scouring the internet and checking out every single review of the two phones, we think we know enough about the Samsung Galaxy S4 and HTC One to pit them against each other and see which one comes out on top. Ready, set, fight!

Design and build quality

Choosing a phone based on looks is usually an issue of personal preferences, as there’s not really a standard and 100% objective way to decide if this device is more elegant and better-looking than that one.

With that in mind, I must admit I’m a complete sucker for HTC One’s design. The aluminum unibody is just dreamy and makes the 4.7-incher look like a $ 600-worth gadget. Call me shallow or however you will, but I want people to notice me if I cough up that much dough for a phone.

Samsung Galaxy S4 vs HTC One-2

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying the GS4 is ugly. It’s just it doesn’t breathe elegance and premium looks the way the HTC One does. And while I’m not a fan of non-removable covers on a handheld, I much prefer the metallic backplate of the One to the cheapo plastic of the S4. Again, it’s a matter of personal preferences and taste, but if you ask me the HTC One looks a lot better and cooler than its opponent.

As for build quality, we’re yet to see the Galaxy S4 drop-tested, while for the time being the One impresses in this department too. The thing is not unbreakable or anything, but it’s darn sturdy.

Winner: HTC One

Display

Believe it or not, the screen fight comes down to personal choice as well. Do you prefer a larger panel or one with a higher pixel density? If it’s the former, you want the Galaxy S4, whereas if you’d rather go for the latter the HTC One is your guy.

Whatever your pick might be, keep in mind that both these giants have stunning displays, with excellent viewing angles and bright colors. The S4 sports a Super AMOLED 5-incher with a Full HD res and 441 ppi, while the One boasts a Super LCD3 4.7-inch panel with the same 1,920 x 1,080 pix res, but a slightly higher 469 ppi.

Winner: It’s a tie

Processing speed and cameras

As you might already know, the Galaxy S4 comes in two different versions, while the One… is just the one. The “standard” S4 model packs a 1.9 GHz quad-core Snapdragon 600 processor, but there’s also a version with an Exynos 5 Octa CPU inside. Unfortunately, the Exynos-powered S4 will only land in a few countries around Europe and Asia in the future.

Meanwhile, the HTC One is the same monster all around the world, with a Snapdragon 600 chipset clocked at 1.7 GHz. An undoubtedly zippy monster, but a tad slower than the Galaxy S4 nevertheless.

Samsung-Exynos-5-Octa

True, no one has really had the time to thoroughly test the two phones and see how big a speed gap there is in real-life conditions, but in synthetic benchmarks Samsung’s flagship comes out on top. The Exynos variant simply smokes the One, while the Snapdragon model is a little more “contained”, but still punchier.

In the camera department, it’s a lot harder to declare a winner, even though on paper you’d think the S4 would come out on top relatively easily once again. But the 13 MP snapper on the back of the 5-incher is not a whole lot better than the 4 MP Ultrapixel snapper of the One, as you can see in several reviews across the web, including this GSM Arena comparison.

There’s no doubt the S4 is better when it comes to still photo quality, but the One has the upper hand in video quality and also has the better list of features, headlined by Zoe.

Winner: Samsung Galaxy S4 by a whisker

Software

Besides the obvious advantage of running Android 4.2 Jelly Bean (vs. 4.1), the Galaxy S4 edges the HTC One in the software battle due to the newest TouchWiz-specific extras added in the mix. True, HTC has come a long way with the Sense UI, which is now sleeker and more elegant than before, but TouchWiz is still better. A little too bloated, but better.

samsung-galaxy-s4-software

On the GS4, you get a heap of special features, like Smart Stay, Smart Pause, Smart Scroll, S Health, S-Voice and so on and so forth. You’ll probably never use some of these more than once, but I find it hard to believe there won’t be at least one feature to make you fall in love with the 4.7-incher.

And yes, some features are plain and simple “gimmicks”. But they’re cool gimmicks and you will love them.

Winner: Galaxy S4

Battery life

The Galaxy S4 has the bigger ticker, at 2,600 mAh, but the HTC One is not too far behind, with a 2,300 mAh battery. And given the One is a little smaller, you’d expect the two to be very close in this battle. And they are, but the S4 ultimately wins.

samsung-galaxy-s4-battery-test

In GSM Arena’s comprehensive three-part battery test, the S4 has the edge in talk time and video playback, while the One wins in web browsing. The huge endurance rating gap however shows that HTC has messed up One’s standby autonomy, which could make a big difference for some users.

Winner: Galaxy S4

Others

Not everything is about the raw speed, the camera’s megapixel count or the cold battery life numbers when it comes to two phenomenal phones like these. There are other things to take into account as well before making the decision to go for one or the other.

The little details can make or break a high-end phone, like the non-removable battery and the lack of microSD support on the One. On the flipside, HTC’s crown jewel is a little cheaper than the S4, both with contracts and outright.

HTC-One-available

There’s nothing to set the two apart in terms of connectivity, as they come with Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC and LTE, while the sound quality is excellent on both phones, but overall a little better on the One, courtesy of the Beats Audio enhancements.

Winner: Tie

Final verdict

Though HTC has clearly stepped things up a notch compared with last year, the One falls short of perfection. The 4.7-incher looks awesome, comes with an excellent quality-price ratio and with a great list of features, but it’s just not enough to break Samsung’s fantastic run.

The Galaxy S4 might not be the biggest upgrade in Samsung’s history and in some ways is only a tad better than the S3, but in the end it beats the One to the punch and is the best overall phone on the market. For now…

Via [GSM Arena], [Android Authority], [Phone Arena] and [Cnet]

The Droid Guy

StumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookRedditLinkedInEmail

Nouveau vs. NVIDIA Linux Comparison Shows Shortcomings

One week after delivering updated Radeon Gallium3D vs. AMD Catalyst benchmarks on Ubuntu Linux, we have to share this morning similar results for the open-source and reverse-engineered “Nouveau” Linux graphics driver compared to the proprietary NVIDIA Linux graphics driver. While the Nouveau driver has come a long way and does support the latest Fermi and Kepler GPUs, it’s not without its share of shortcomings. Eleven NVIDIA GeForce graphics cards were used in this latest Phoronix comparison.
Phoronix

StumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookRedditLinkedInEmail

Comparison of Linux Desktops OpenGL Performance

With Steam officially being released for Linux I took some time out this evening to run a few benchmarks on my Ubuntu 12.04 based Bodhi system to see how a few of the different modern Linux desktops compare in terms of OpenGL performance with the source engine. KDE, XFCE, LXDE, Unity and E17 are compared.
LXer Linux News

StumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookRedditLinkedInEmail

Ubuntu 13.04 Desktop Gaming Performance Comparison

In this article are some early benchmark results comparing the OpenGL gaming performance of the Unity, Xfce, Openbox, LXDE, KDE, GNOME Shell, and Enlightenment desktops when running on a recent development snapshot of Ubuntu 13.04. As many earlier benchmarks have shown, the OpenGL frame-rate for Linux games can sway quite greatly depending upon the desktop in use and more specifically the desktop‘s compositing window manager.
LXer Linux News

StumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookRedditLinkedInEmail

Five-Way NVIDIA GeForce Comparison On Nouveau

With the GeForce 600 “Kepler” graphics cards now working on Nouveau in an out-of-the-box manner with OpenGL acceleration, here’s a brief five-way NVIDIA GeForce graphics card comparison when using the Nouveau open-source driver with the Linux 3.8 kernel and Mesa 9.1-devel.
Phoronix

StumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookRedditLinkedInEmail

Ubuntu 13.04 Desktop Comparison: 6 Desktops, 5 Driver/GPUs

In this article are benchmarks of six different desktops (Unity, GNOME Shell, GNOME Classic, KDE Plasma, Xfce, and LXDE) on five different GPU/driver configurations (Radeon, Catalyst, Intel, NVIDIA, and Nouveau) running the very latest Ubuntu 13.04 “Raring Ringtail” development packages to look at the latest state of the Ubuntu Linux gaming OpenGL performance.
Phoronix

StumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookRedditLinkedInEmail

A NUMA Linux Kernel Performance Comparison

For those interested in Non-Unified Memory Access performance under Linux, here’s an independent performance comparison that puts the mainline kernel against three other NUMA kernels…
Phoronix

StumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookRedditLinkedInEmail

Amazon EC2 Linux OS Comparison

In preparation for the imminent release of Phoronix Test Suite 4.2-Randaberg, final validation testing was done on a variety of Linux operating systems in Amazon’s EC2 compute cloud. Many of the official Linux images were benchmarked from the c1.xlarge High-CPU Extra Large Instance, including Amazon Linux AMI 2012.09, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.3, Ubuntu 11.10, Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS, and SUSE Linux Enterprise 11.



Phoronix

StumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookRedditLinkedInEmail

8-Way NVIDIA Nouveau GPU Comparison

After earlier this week delivering a 12-way AMD Radeon graphics card comparison with the open-source Linux Gallium3D graphics driver, being published today is a similar comparison on the NVIDIA side. Tested for this article were eight NVIDIA GeForce graphics cards from multiple hardware generations while using the very latest open-source Nouveau driver code.



Phoronix

StumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookRedditLinkedInEmail

Image Quality Comparison: Radeon Gallium3D vs. Catalyst

Coming up in the next few days will be benchmarks of Mesa 8.0 with Morphological Anti-Aliasing (a.k.a. MLAA) plus some other imaging-oriented work/announcements to come in the near future. With that said, this weekend prior to leaving for Munich I ran some tests of the Radeon Gallium3D and Catalyst drivers when comparing the image quality…

Phoronix

StumbleUponDiggTwitterFacebookRedditLinkedInEmail