Canonical, on its official blog, is promoting the latest release of the Ceph distributed storage system, titled Cuttlefish. Why is that noteworthy? Because the post doesn’t mention Canonical’s Linux distribution (Ubuntu) at all, and instead focuses in large part on what Ceph is doing for Red Hat. Is Ceph that important to the open-source and Big Data ecosystems that it can bring competitors so selflessly together like this?
LXer Linux News
Canonical Promotes Ceph Big Data Storage System… For Red Hat?
Distributed Storage Across Four Storage Nodes With GlusterFS 3.2.x On Ubuntu 12.10
Distributed Storage Across Four Storage Nodes With GlusterFS 3.2.x On Ubuntu 12.10
This tutorial shows how to combine four single storage servers (running Ubuntu 12.10) to one large storage server (distributed storage) with GlusterFS. The client system (Ubuntu 12.10 as well) will be able to access the storage as if it was a local filesystem. GlusterFS is a clustered file-system capable of scaling to several peta-bytes. It aggregates various storage bricks over Infiniband RDMA or TCP/IP interconnect into one large parallel network file system. Storage bricks can be made of any commodity hardware such as x86_64 servers with SATA-II RAID and Infiniband HBA.
Microsoft’s Surface Pro Actually has More Storage Than we Think
Microsoft’s Windows Phone 8 operating system has failed to gain traction as the company’s continued attempts at a revival haven’t reaped fruits. The company’s aspirations in the tablet market too were heavily stunted when the Surface RT failed to impress the market (mainly because of Microsoft’s insane marketing strategy). However, all of that was supposed to be changed with the launch of the Surface Pro tomorrow (Feb 9) which is supposed to give users a much more complete experience compared to the Surface RT. But even the Surface Pro wasn’t spared from criticism as it was said to have substantially lesser storage than what Microsoft had us believe. The 128GB Surface Pro apparently came with storage of only 89.7GB, which is appalling really when we consider how much the customer is paying for the tablet.
But a neat little comparison by ZDNet’s Ed Bott reveals that not all is bad for the Surface Pro. He did a little comparison of the storage between the 128GB Surface Pro and the 128GB Apple MacBook Air and the results were astonishing to say the least. The part of the reason why the Surface Pro only comes with 89.7GB of storage is because of the recovery partition tools built into the system which eats up a good amount of space. Remove that and the tablet/notebook actually comes with more storage than the 128GB MacBook Air.
The MacBook Air 128GB comes with 92.2GB of storage, while the Microsoft Surface Pro packs 89.7GB of storage with the recovery partition. However, removing the recovery partition gives the Surface Pro over 97 gigs of storage, which is good enough for a notebook or a tablet of its caliber. The MacBook Air doesn’t come with recovery tools and hence comes with more storage out of the box. This should be a sigh of relief for potential buyers and Microsoft as it cannot afford to fail with the Surface Pro too. Many other issues are yet to be sorted out and we’ll know more once the device actually arrives in the stores and people begin discovering the shortcomings of the tablet with each growing day.
The Surface Pro will retail for $ 899 and $ 999 for the 64 and 128GB variants respectively. If you think the storage is a deal breaker, then you can be assured of the fact that it packs a microSD slot as well as a full USB port among other options to expand the storage. It’s basically like a full fledged notebook, but only better and with touch input. Bear in mind, the touch or type cover is to be sold separately and is not included in the aforementioned price. So whether the Surface Pro is a wise choice for over $ 1,000 is a decision the users will have to make ultimately. As of now though, it seems like waiting a few weeks is the wise thing to do. Sound off in the comments section below if you think the Microsoft Surface Pro is worth your money.
Source: ZDNet
Via: WP Central
Red Hat Adds Cloud, Storage and Virtualization Support
Red Hat (NYSE: RHT) has introduced technical account management (TAM) services for cloud computing, virtualization and storage. The consulting offerings are highly important as the open source company attempts to compete more aggressively against VMware (NYSE: VMW) and EMC (NYSE: EMC), in particular.
LXer Linux News
Microsoft defends Surface Pro’s 4-hour battery life and low available storage

Distributed Replicated Storage Across Four Storage Nodes With GlusterFS 3.2.x On Ubuntu 12.10
Distributed Replicated Storage Across Four Storage Nodes With GlusterFS 3.2.x On Ubuntu 12.10
This tutorial shows how to combine four single storage servers (running Ubuntu 12.10) to a distributed replicated storage with GlusterFS. Nodes 1 and 2 (replication1) as well as 3 and 4 (replication2) will mirror each other, and replication1 and replication2 will be combined to one larger storage server (distribution). Basically, this is RAID10 over network. If you lose one server from replication1 and one from replication2, the distributed volume continues to work. The client system (Ubuntu 12.10 as well) will be able to access the storage as if it was a local filesystem. GlusterFS is a clustered file-system capable of scaling to several peta-bytes. It aggregates various storage bricks over Infiniband RDMA or TCP/IP interconnect into one large parallel network file system. Storage bricks can be made of any commodity hardware such as x86_64 servers with SATA-II RAID and Infiniband HBA.
Internal Memory Storage: Apple’s Next Market Strategy
[Photo Credit: GSM Nation]
Apple has done well to bring a 128GB iPad (and soon, a 128GB iPhone) to its current lineup. The memory storage size increase is a positive step for businessmen and businesswomen who simply need more storage for more file uploads, downloads, and other executive tasks. Apple has taken Microsoft head-on with its new large-size devices with large memory storage that can be used as a PC/laptop/tablet. If Apple wants to show consumers that we currently live in a “post-PC” era, what better way to do that than to take the traditional laptop and reduce it to a mobile tablet with a physical keyboard, for instance? The additional memory size will be a huge hit with business consumers who do not want to resort to a USB flash drive whenever their device memory is exhausted.
Today, consumers know Apple’s memory storage versions by heart (16GB, 32GB, 64GB); there was a time, however, when Apple sold 8GB versions of its iPhone and iPods. At some point, Cupertino decided to kill the 8GB versions of its devices because consumers want more data. The new 128GB memory storage size brings up a question that surfaced and dominated in its past: what does the new memory storage size mean for the smallest memory storage size currently (16GB)? Could Apple be prepared to eliminate its 16GB device in favor of a product line that consists of only 32GB, 64GB, and 128GB devices?
While this thought may seem silly at first, there is some merit to it. After all, the memory storage increase revamp will add to consumer loyalty. Consumers have always chosen the 16GB device in large numbers because many consumers are not hard-core gamers, photographers, or businessmen. The 16GB device has a current price of $ 200 with a two-year contract, but to increase the lowest device memory two-hundred percent (from 16GB to 32GB) while keeping the price at $ 200 for a 32GB (once 16GB), $ 300 for a 64GB (once 32GB), and $ 400 for a 128GB (once 64GB) may be just the thing that adds customers to the newest 128GB iPhone.
Next, the memory storage increase, should Apple bump up the storage, may encourage more spending in the App Store and iTunes. After all, hard-core gamers are not the only customers that want more storage; music and movie lovers do, as well. Customers who want more storage for their favorite activities are more inclined to make greater purchases in the iTunes store than they would on a lower memory storage device. It was reported by Forbes magazine a little over a week ago that iTunes profits were up by only $ 0.7 billion (from $ 3 billion to $ 3.7 billion) in Q1 2013. While $ 700 million is not a bad profit, it does not look well for a company whose budget ranges in the billions and has a current bank account totaling $ 137 billion. The memory storage will bring in more revenue and profit for iTunes and help Apple stay competitive against the likes of Rdio and Spotify, two Internet music streaming services. A rumor surfaced some months ago that Apple wanted to bring a “Spotify-like” Internet music service to its current programs; once the rumor hit the press, Spotify stock dropped 25%, leading many to believe that Apple would capitalize if it produced an Internet music-streaming service.
Apple’s tablets and smartphones have always been perceived as nothing more than consumer leisure products. Apple, however, has a greater goal in mind: its push to see iPhones and iPads in the classroom and business workplace show that Apple, like Microsoft, wants to tailor itself for businesses, too. The company has always been about consumer electronics, but its image could be changing in 2013.
Setting Up A Standalone Storage Server With GlusterFS And Samba On Debian Squeeze
Setting Up A Standalone Storage Server With GlusterFS And Samba On Debian Squeeze
This tutorial shows how to set up a standalone storage server on Debian 6.0, using GlusterFS and SAMBA, and custom scripts and settings to make life easier.
Striping Across Four Storage Nodes With GlusterFS 3.2.x On Ubuntu 12.10
Striping Across Four Storage Nodes With GlusterFS 3.2.x On Ubuntu 12.10
This tutorial shows how to do data striping (segmentation of logically sequential data, such as a single file, so that segments can be assigned to multiple physical devices in a round-robin fashion and thus written concurrently) across four single storage servers (running Ubuntu 12.10) with GlusterFS. The client system (Ubuntu 12.10 as well) will be able to access the storage as if it was a local filesystem. GlusterFS is a clustered file-system capable of scaling to several peta-bytes. It aggregates various storage bricks over Infiniband RDMA or TCP/IP interconnect into one large parallel network file system. Storage bricks can be made of any commodity hardware such as x86_64 servers with SATA-II RAID and Infiniband HBA.
Striping Across Four Storage Nodes With GlusterFS 3.2.x On CentOS 6.3
This tutorial shows how to do data striping across four single storage servers (running CentOS 6.3) with GlusterFS. The client system (CentOS 6.3 as well) will be able to access the storage as if it was a local filesystem. GlusterFS is a clustered file-system capable of scaling to several peta-bytes. It aggregates various storage bricks over Infiniband RDMA or TCP/IP interconnect into one large parallel network file system. Storage bricks can be made of any commodity hardware such as x86_64 servers with SATA-II RAID and Infiniband HBA.
LXer Linux News
Striping Across Four Storage Nodes With GlusterFS 3.2.x On CentOS 6.3
Striping Across Four Storage Nodes With GlusterFS 3.2.x On CentOS 6.3
This tutorial shows how to do data striping (segmentation of logically sequential data, such as a single file, so that segments can be assigned to multiple physical devices in a round-robin fashion and thus written concurrently) across four single storage servers (running CentOS 6.3) with GlusterFS. The client system (CentOS 6.3 as well) will be able to access the storage as if it was a local filesystem. GlusterFS is a clustered file-system capable of scaling to several peta-bytes. It aggregates various storage bricks over Infiniband RDMA or TCP/IP interconnect into one large parallel network file system. Storage bricks can be made of any commodity hardware such as x86_64 servers with SATA-II RAID and Infiniband HBA.













